--- a/licence.rst Thu Sep 24 20:58:18 2009 +0300
+++ b/licence.rst Mon Sep 28 23:30:21 2009 +0300
@@ -1,19 +1,122 @@
-*- mode: outline; fill-column: 78 -*-
-* Where find info on licence?
+* Where find info on licence issue?
See:
* http://www.opensource.org/licenses
-
-Also see:
-
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_software_licences
* http://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_FSF_approved_software_licences
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_free_software_licences
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_source_license
+* List of FOSS licences.
+
+** BSD.
+
+See
+
+ http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php
+ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_license
+
+** MIT.
+
+** GPL.
+
+GPL (GNU genneral public licence)
+
+** LGPL.
+
+** ZLIB.
+
+** MPL.
+
+MPL (Mozilla public license)
+
+** CPL.
+
+CPL (Common Public License)
+
+See
+
+ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Public_License
+
+* Compration of FOSS licences.
+
+'Yes', 'No' mees that this requirement present in licence text.
+'N/A' mees that requirement or it negation does not present in licence text.
+
+Also you must understand that your country copyright low have more priority than
+licence text.
+
+ Public
+ + domain + BSD + MIT + GPL + LGPL + ZLIB + MPL + Apache + CPL +
+ | | | | | | | | | |
+Need hold | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes? | Yes?| Yes? | |
+author signature? | | | | | | | | | |
+ | | | | | | | | | |
+Need distribute | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | No? | Yes?| No? | |
+src with bin? | | | | | | | | | |
+ | | | | | | | | | |
+Need rename | No | N/A | N/A | No? | No? | No? | No? | Yes? | |
+derivative work? | | | | | | | | | |
+ | | | | | | | | | |
+Need mark | No | N/A | No? | Yes?|Yes? | |Yes? | No? | |
+changes? | | | | | | | | | |
+ | | | | | | | | | |
+Copyleft? | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | No |Yes? | No? | |
+ | | | | | | | | | |
+Depend on user | No | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | No? | Yes?| No? | |
+location? | | | | | | | | | |
+ | | | | | | | | | |
+Has disclaimer? | No | Yes | Yes?| Yes?| Yes? | Yes? | Yes?| Yes? | |
+ | | | | | | | | | |
+DFSG | | | | | | | | | |
+compateble? | | | | | | | | | |
+ | | | | | | | | | |
+Free? | | | | | | | | | |
+ | | | | | | | | | |
+OSI approved? | | | | | | | | | |
+ | | | | | | | | | |
+GPL | | | | | | | | | |
+compatible? | | | | | | | | | |
+ | | | | | | | | | |
+License can | Yes | N/A | N/A | No | No | |Yes? | N/A? | |
+changed? | | | | | | | | | |
+ +--------+-----+-----+-----+------+------+-----+--------+-----+
+
+** Need hold author signature.
+
+This meen that you can not remove notice by whos done original work.
+
+** Need mark changes.
+
+This meen that you must say that part is original product that part is your
+changes.
+
+Typically this can be done by distributing original sources and patches for
+them or describe what source file you cange and how (for example this
+sometimes done in CHANGELOG files).
+
+In any way when precedent occur you must prove that part of work is your.
+
+** Need rename derivative work.
+
+This meen that you derivative work must have another name that original.
+
+Usually author in such way hold their users from derivative foreign toys based
+on thier work.
+
+** Copyleft.
+
+This meen that any derivative work must be covered by save licence as
+original.
+
+** Licence can be changed.
+
+This meen is can text of original licence changed.
+
* How apply license?
** Creative commons license.
@@ -145,4 +248,3 @@
http://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/27-trips_01_e.htm
Text of convention.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agreement_on_Trade-Related_Aspects_of_Intellectual_Property_Rights
-
--- a/lvm.rst Thu Sep 24 20:58:18 2009 +0300
+++ b/lvm.rst Mon Sep 28 23:30:21 2009 +0300
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
* Debian package.
- $ sudo apt-get --install lvm
+ $ sudo apt-get install lvm
* See partitions.