.. -*- coding: utf-8 -*-

=================

 Version format.

=================

.. contents::

Feature set versioning.

=======================

Feature set versioning pretend to show how serious changes made according to

feature availability and how compatible these versions.

Marketing versioning.

=====================

Marketing versioning schema used for marketing, advertising, branding purpose.

It is usually inconsistent and can changed over the time.

Examples of marketing version schema:

 * Years.

 * Ancient gods.

 * Star/satellite/galactic names.

Look thread for GDB:

  http://www.cygwin.com/ml/gdb/2007-07/msg00061.html

There discussed:

 * Is it essential to update major version if significant change made for

   licence? Answer: **NO**!

   GPLv3 is a big deal spread out over the whole GNU project, but not a big deal

   for GDB in particular.

 * Is it right follow date version schema regardless major changes? Answer:

   **NO**!

   Many OS distribution encode year in versions but versions does not present

   featureset but package set instead.

Year as version name.

---------------------

If year used as version some people can decide that 2005 is too old and broken

if it used in 2007. So companies release product by leading year number. So in

2007 they release 2008 version.

Version name components.

========================

 * major

 * minor

 * patch (patchlevel), micro

 * rev (revision)

 * build

 * date

 * hotfix, fix

Version components usually combined in such group::

  major.minor.build

  major.minor.date

  major.minor.hotfix

  major.minor.hotfix.build

  major.minor.rev

  major.minor.rev.build

  major.current.age

Its conventional to have at least a major and minor number.

Prefixing version with a "v" seems to be less common.

Version in package/release name.

================================

::

  PACKAGE-MAJ.MIN.FIX.tar.gz   (Common style)

  PACKAGE-MAJ.MIN.FIX.zip

  PACKAGE-MAJ.MIN.FIX-DISTROFIX.tar.gz  (Cygwin style)

  PACKAGE_EPOCH:MAJ.MIN.FIX-DISTROFIX_ARCH.deb (Debian style)

From "Debian Policy Manual"::

  Package names must consist only of lower case letters (`a-z'), digits

  (`0-9'), plus (`+') and minus (`-') signs, and periods (`.').  They

  must be at least two characters long and must start with an

  alphanumeric character.

If you look carefully there are no any ``_`` (underscore) chars!! Also ``-`` is

portable char in file name accoding to POSIX.

Versioning for libraries/modules/components.

============================================

Major version component.

------------------------

Major number change means that fundamental change made in the architecture of

the system the new version is incompatible with the old one, upgrade between

versions is non-trivial, and any dependent of the prior version will require

code changes to upgrade to the new package.

Major number rare changed (this can take a lot of year).

Minor version component.

------------------------

Minor number change means that the new version is backward compatible with the

previous version but has significant enhancements over the previous version

(like new functionality or changed UI).

Functional enhancement releases. Contain new or significantly changed

functionality and/or layout.

New releases are usually only published several times a year or less.

Revision, micro, bugfix version component.

------------------------------------------

Revision number is updated whenever a bugfix or security patche is applied to

the build such that it doesn't bring a compatibility change or introduce newer

features.

Patches are released frequently (sometimes daily).

Milestone markers.

------------------

 * a (alpha) means new development is complete and code checkins are frozen.

   Alpha builds should work well enough to be testable.

 * b (beta) means most severe bugs are fixed and end users can start trying the

   release.

 * rc (release candidate) are believed to meet all of the criteria for release

   and can be installed on test instances of production systems.

Compatibility formula.

----------------------

Assume that app linked with new version of lib. Thus::

  is_compatible_with_old(old, new) {

    if (old.major != new.major) return 0;

    if (old.minor > new.minor) return 0;

    return 1;

  }

Assume that app linked with old version of lib. Thus::

  is_compatible_with_new(old, new) {

    if (old.major != new.major) return 0;

    return 1;

  }

Versioning for products.

========================

Versioning for products differ from versioning for libraries.

Product is a set of conponents that stalled to some versions. Components can be

switches as written for library versioning:

 * Any fix releases interchanged, greater version mean less bug count.

 * Any minor release interchanged with next minor releases.

 * Major release does not interchanged at all, switching from old to new require

   upgrade.

Product update vs upgrade.

--------------------------

Product update involve:

 * Replacing product executable files, resources files.

 * Config files and user data stay unchanged.

Product upgrade involve:

 * Replacing product executable files, resources files.

 * Config files and used data require modification and performed by upgrade

   scripts or manually by user (if this is ever possible).

Build data.

===========

 * Build number.

 * Build date.

 * VCS revision.

 * Branch-tag used.

 * Overnight build (Y/N).

 * QA tested (Y/N).

 * QA test results (Pass/Fail).

 * Location of full build logs.

Stop your VCS hook to update version!

=====================================

Don't update version without human decision.

Why do not do this on success build:

 * You can have several build machine which may concurrently update version.

 * There does not exist tools for easy querying for status of build by its

   number (as ok/fail, build configuration, date, coverage, lint checks status,

   etc).

 * Some part of development team may not have permission for bumping version and

   they must revert some automatically updated files after build.

Why do not do this from pre-/post-commit hooks:

 * Some changes can only partially introduce feature/bugfix.

Version ordering formula.

=========================

Strongly recommend:

 * Numbers are not decimal fractions. They are integers separated by delimiters.

 * Only offically released versions of the program get version numbers.

   Development snapshots don't. Nor do test releases.

 * If the last component is zero, it may be omitted. Do not distinguish version

   X.Y from version X.Y.0.

 * Avoid using anything other than numbers in version numbers.

Debian version ordering formula.

--------------------------------

The version number of a package.  The format is::

  [<epoch>`:']<upstream_version>[`-'<debian_revision>]

The three components here are:

``epoch``

     This is a single (generally small) unsigned integer.  It may be

     omitted, in which case zero is assumed.  If it is omitted then

     the <upstream_version> may not contain any colons.

     It is provided to allow mistakes in the version numbers of older

     versions of a package, and also a package's previous version

     numbering schemes, to be left behind.

``upstream_version``

     This is the main part of the version number.  It is usually the

     version number of the original ("upstream") package from which

     the ``.deb`` file has been made, if this is applicable.  Usually

     this will be in the same format as that specified by the upstream

     author(s); however, it may need to be reformatted to fit into the

     package management system's format and comparison scheme.

     The comparison behavior of the package management system with

     respect to the <upstream_version> is described below.  The

     <upstream_version> portion of the version number is mandatory.

     The <upstream_version> may contain only alphanumerics[1] and the characters

     ``.`` ``+`` ``-`` ``:`` ``~`` (full stop, plus, hyphen, colon, tilde) and

     should start with a digit. If there is no <debian_revision> then hyphens

     are not allowed; if there is no <epoch> then colons are not allowed.

``debian_revision``

     This part of the version number specifies the version of the

     Debian package based on the upstream version.  It may contain

     only alphanumerics and the characters ``+`` ``.`` ``~`` (plus, full

     stop, tilde) and is compared in the same way as the

     <upstream_version> is.

     It is optional; if it isn't present then the <upstream_version>

     may not contain a hyphen.  This format represents the case where

     a piece of software was written specifically to be turned into a

     Debian package, and so there is only one "debianisation" of it

     and therefore no revision indication is required.

     It is conventional to restart the <debian_revision> at ``1`` each

     time the <upstream_version> is increased.

     The package management system will break the version number apart

     at the last hyphen in the string (if there is one) to determine

     the <upstream_version> and <debian_revision>.  The absence of a

     <debian_revision> compares earlier than the presence of one (but

     note that the <debian_revision> is the least significant part of

     the version number).

The <upstream_version> and <debian_revision> parts are compared by the

package management system using the same algorithm:

The strings are compared from left to right.

First the initial part of each string consisting entirely of non-digit

characters is determined.  These two parts (one of which may be empty)

are compared lexically.  If a difference is found it is returned.  The

lexical comparison is a comparison of ASCII values modified so that

all the letters sort earlier than all the non-letters and so that a

tilde sorts before anything, even the end of a part.  For example, the

following parts are in sorted order from earliest to latest: ``~~``,

``~~a``, ``~``, the empty part, ``a``.[2]

Then the initial part of the remainder of each string which consists

entirely of digit characters is determined.  The numerical values of

these two parts are compared, and any difference found is returned as

the result of the comparison.  For these purposes an empty string

(which can only occur at the end of one or both version strings being

compared) counts as zero.

These two steps (comparing and removing initial non-digit strings and

initial digit strings) are repeated until a difference is found or

both strings are exhausted.

Note that the purpose of epochs is to allow us to leave behind

mistakes in version numbering, and to cope with situations where the

version numbering scheme changes.  It is _not_ intended to cope with

version numbers containing strings of letters which the package

management system cannot interpret (such as ``ALPHA`` or ``pre-``), or

with silly orderings (the author of this manual has heard of a package

whose versions went ``1.1``, ``1.2``, ``1.3``, ``1``, ``2.1``, ``2.2``,

``2`` and so forth).

[1]  Alphanumerics are ``A-Za-z0-9`` only.

[2]  One common use of ``~`` is for upstream pre-releases.  For example,

     ``1.0~beta1~svn1245`` sorts earlier than ``1.0~beta1``, which sorts

     earlier than ``1.0``.

Semver version ordering formula.

--------------------------------

::

  if (A.major != B.major) return A.major > B.major;

  if (A.minor != B.minor) return A.minor > B.minor;

  if (A.patch != B.patch) return A.patch > B.patch;

  if (A.special == B.special) return 0;

  if (A.special == "") return 1;

  if (B.special == "") return -1;

  return A.special > B.special;

**NOTE** Accoding to this definition 1.0.1rc1 < 1.0.1rc10 < 1.0.1rc2 which is

non meaningful.

Odd/even numbering.

-------------------

Who use:

  GLib GTK+ Gimp GNOME Kaffe

Forms of compatibility.

=======================

Runtime or binary compatibility mean that binary can be swaped with another

version without breaking normal program work.

Compile time or source compatibility mean that supplied header/interfaces allow

successful compiling/linking.

Examples:

 * Change type of argument in method to more generic take source compatibility

   but break binary compatibility.

 * Adding new method to abstract class take binary compatibility but break

   compilation (unimplement method error).

Reference.

==========

  http://semver.org/

                Semantic Versioning

  http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Version

                Debian

  http://www.openbsd.org/faq/ports/specialtopics.html

                OpenBSD

  http://java.sun.com/j2se/versioning_naming.html

                Oracle

  http://www.intel.com/support/graphics/sb/CS-020667.htm

                Intel

  http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Version_Numbering

                Eclipse

  http://apr.apache.org/versioning.html

                Apache

  http://www106.pair.com/rhp/parallel.html

                Conflict resolution

  http://www.rpm.org/wiki/PackagerDocs/Dependencies

                RH

  http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-depend-manual-dependencies.html

                RH

  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines

                RH

  http://wikis.sun.com/display/IpsBestPractices/Packaging+Best+Practices+-+Versioning

                Oracle

  http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Dependency+Mediation+and+Conflict+Resolution

                Maven

  http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Versioning

                Maven